Showing posts with label Whatcom County Jobs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Whatcom County Jobs. Show all posts

Monday, November 4, 2013

Whatcom Works On, Even After Elections

Yesterday was Sunday. As a family, we take a break on Sunday. You know, work six days, rest one day. It actually works out pretty good. Keeps life in better shape, having a private world, leaving the work grind to be a listener for a day. Even during the election season. 

The issue of work always seems to crop up some where. You’ve heard it before, haven’t you? —you don’t work, you don’t eat…

What do you work for? Money? Happy clients or bosses? Influence in community affairs? Food? Bills to pay? We all know there are some tasks that give quick returns, and some that take years to pay back, like raising a family. 

To me, family is very important! One man classed a life in four periods. Age 0-20 is preparation, learning, growing up. Age 21-40 is “business and babies”. Age 41-60 is enjoying and enabling your young adults and their children. In this man’s scheme, age 61-xx was being a resource to the larger community. What happened to that man? In his 41-60 year period—his wife died. His oldest son Josh, wrote a book that shook church young people across the country, “I Kissed Dating Goodbye.” His youngest sons, Brett and Alex wrote a book several years later that again shook church young people across the country, “Do Hard Things”. 

Gregg Harris is a sort of hero of mine. He had a large footprint twenty years ago in the home school community. I have met him, talked with him. Some things he says really resonate. Some things don’t. Nobody is perfect. Gregg did not hold on to the national spotlight. He pulled back and settled in the Portland area, invested in his family, and worked at living out his ideals. In the process, he rose above unexpected loss and reversal. He is a survivor. He is the real thing.

Someone said that the best palm tree fruit is from the oldest palms, the ones with the hurricane scars. I don’t know, I seem to spend more time in cold places than warm ones, but this rings true.  Life has blows, and older people usually are more patient, more attentive, more efficient, more giving. I’d rather have a grandfather than a fresh out of college social worker supervising my work, wouldn’t you?

Age 60-xx.  Death. That’s not really the end, is it? What do you live and work for? Do you care about what comes the day after your parents die? The day after you die? Your children? Their children? Can you see that far ahead?

Tomorrow, Whatcom County will begin counting its votes. For several months, there has been this cramping focus on electing community leaders. This year, it is jobs vs. the environment. I would cast it as family jobs vs government jobs. The environment is just a wrapper. Actually, family is a wrapper or sorts. Many wrappers get thrown away. Some of our most loved American heroes were orphans. My point—no matter who wins this election, work remains, and we must work together or we will needlessly suffer together.

Last night, our family watched a video on immigration. Many people are coming to our country and county to work, legally and illegally. And, amid the hopeful are the evil few. Drug cartel operatives. Terrorist infiltrators. If a Muslim loses his prayer mat in an airport, you pick it up and hand it back. If he drops it while slipping across the US-Mexican border, you suspect another motive. There is a reason for immigration work laws and border security. 

We all must face the reality of loss, of death, of trading in life. A few years ago, a marketing book title asked, “Who moved the cheese?”  Markets come and go. A contractor client friend of mine here in Whatcom County lost his livelihood when the housing work bubble burst. Today, he and his family live in North Dakota, working in the oil patch. What is firmly in hand today may be gone tomorrow.

Work. Jobs. Survival. Wednesday, the election campaign machines will start to spin down. Most of us will go back to focusing on making our living. Some will comment on what has happened in the election, and some will just wonder what happened.

A big deal these days is disaster prepping. Supposedly, over 3 million Americans are preppers, people who expect a major calamitous blow to the United States, and work unusually hard making food and shelter and security preparations to be a survivor.

Are you a prepper? Where is your survival plan? Your job? Secure investments? A Facebook circle of fans? For many, prepping is working at a good government job, or a good medical job. For now, there is tax money in taking care of the weak. I worked a short contract as a Washington State Electrical Inspector. I was the last man hired, and the first man laid off when the extra department money ran out. Four years later, I was glad I had started my own business, when construction collapsed and many tenured electrical inspectors got pink slips. Government employers can be just as hard and unfeeling as private sector employers.

Whatcom Works. Why this blog? It has been said the best preparation for a crisis is to have good relationships with your neighbors. Is money in the bank the best asset? Silver in a sock? Food on the hoof? These may be life building blocks, but relationships are the cement, the glue. Relationships take work. The best relationship is with the transcendent God. Do you know your neighbors? Talk to them? Do you think about tough times? Do you know how to roll up your sleeves and work when disaster strikes? Before it strikes? Good times are the practice before the big game.

In weeks ahead, I will continue to highlight people and ideas that work and give back, and perceived threats to those values. People are either givers or takers. The elections end for now, but public policy meetings and legislation grinds on. And, the laying of foundations for the next generation of givers is even more critical and demanding. Families and children are very important.

Jobs. Death. Life. The seed with the life germ may rot in the cold ground, but the new life springs up on the resources of the former life. There is hope. Work on, Whatcom County.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

The Low Impact Tourism Myth And The Whatcom County Economy

Low impact tourism is the cream cheese frosting of the Whatcom County economy.  

A philosophy that supplants more vigorous sectors of the local economy with Low Impact Tourism is like a philosophy aimed at eliminating vegetables, meats and, grains from a balanced diet and replacing them with cream cheese frosting.

So one can only assume local politicians intent on promoting low impact tourism to the detriment of more vigorous economic sectors are really promoting low wage jobs with limited hours and equally limited sales tax and other tax income for the economy.

Cream cheese frosting simply hasn’t the nutrition to support a large economy but I would never want to do without it; and, I’d never want to downgrade, or eliminate tourism as an important part of the local economy; but facts are facts.  

I will be issuing a short white paper on so called, “Low Impact Tourism” in the near future but, for now, here are some easily checked facts that help put the whole issue in perspective:

1.  Leavenworth is one of Washington’s most famous destination cities for tourism with a Bavarian Village theme, ski slopes at the edge of town, climbing, biking and hiking trails throughout the surrounding area and, according to the Mayor’s report to the people, more than 2 million visitors a year.

Leavenworth’s total Sales and Use Tax Distributions in 2012 according to the Washington State Department of Revenue was $936,242.  

Based on recent conversation by the City of Bellingham as it examines a move from one area of town to another by Costco Corporation, the entire city of Leavenworth receives less in sales and use tax, despite having 2 million tourists visit, than a single Costco Store in Bellingham provides the city in a year.  

2.  By way of further example, the City of Blaine alone received $1,122,250.96 in sales and use tax distributions in 2012.

3.  According to the 2013 report on Washington State Tourism by Damon Runyan Associates, of the six tourism oriented activities examined statewide, Beach, Cultural, Fine Dining, Outdoor Activity, Shopping and, Rural Sightseeing, the three sectors generally defined as low impact tourism are last in terms of dollars spent per partyengaging in the activity while shopping, cultural activities and fine dining led.  It has long been known that Bellis Fair is Whatcom County’s number one tourist attraction and that seems to remain the case though Wal-Mart and Costco are probably close behind.  

NOTE:  It is interesting that a travel industry sector touted as “low impact,” the Outdoor Activities sector, reports, by a considerable margin, the highest spending levels on transportation.

4.   Also based on the Runyan report, two persons working in the Whatcom County tourism industry will earn about 64% of the median family income for the county, qualifying them for low income housing subsidies and other income supplements.

5.  The travel/tourism industry is largely a provider of part time work.  Nationally, the average hours per week an employee works peaks in the third quarter of a year at about 26 hours.  

In short, while the tourism industry truly is an important sector of the Whatcom County economy it is equally, the frosting on the more substantial cake of that Whatcom County economy.  

That means efforts to build the industry beyond what it is today at the cost of more substantial industries and the family wage jobs they provide involves a tradeoff.  

The recent conversion of nearly 9,000 acres of forest land dedicated to use by the forest industry to the 800,000 plus acres of land in Whatcom County already dedicated to tourist uses stands as an example of the tradeoffs made by accentuating a part time, low wage industry in favor of an industry providing a significant number of family wage jobs to county residents.

Frosting is delicious and delightful to behold.  Frosting cannot be the basis of a healthy diet; for an individual or for an economy.

-Jack Petree

Monday, October 21, 2013

Money That Bites


Money. There has been much bluster about outside money in Whatcom County’s 2013 election. The early, high profile, aggressive entrance of environmentalist big bucks from Washington Conservation Voters, and the more recent and quieter arrival of free market big bucks from proponents of the Gateway Pacific Terminal have raised eyebrows everywhere in Whatcom County.

Today I learned of a larger proposed influx of outside money into Whatcom County, $300,000 from the Puget Sound Partnership to “develop a stakeholder process”, facilitating the planning stage of repairing flood control levees. $300,000 for a contractor/facilitator to do something different than campaign against or for a bulk shipping terminal. A larger sum. A very quiet entry. An agreement recommended to County Council for approval. The second coming of the failed WIT / public planner driven process. A mercenary gauntlet thrown down to mock and demoralize the volunteer stakeholder process of the resurrected WRIA 1 Water Planning Unit.

Recently, I saw an interesting infogram. An iceberg was floating in the water. Visible above the surface was a layer labelled “The Exciting Green Marketplace”. The first layer below the water was labelled “Usable Social and Environmental Disasters”. Below that was a layer with three community ideals: 1) Social Equity 2) Public/Private Economic Partnerships, and 3) Sustainable Ecology. Finally, at the bottom was the philosophical foundation layer: eradicate individualism, capitalism and free markets, and implement communitarian groupthink with big government control of everything.

Did you get that last mouthful? Did I lose you there? I hope not.

What will happen in Whatcom County after this election? What is going on under the cover of election noise? Tuesday, County Council is scheduled to look at bill AB2013-335. It is proposed that Whatcom County enter into an agreement to receive $300,000 via the Puget Sound Partnership, the Washington State Governor’s flagship regional non-elected board tasked with “cleaning up” Puget Sound, among other things. Puget Sound Partnership is a regional board. How clean is clean? Who knows? How can voters hold the PSP board locally accountable? Ensure cleanup or “flood control” standards that don’t shift at the ratcheting whim of communitarian puppet masters.

Regionalism. In 2012, Stanley Kurtz published a book entitled, “Spreading the Wealth: How Obama Is Robbing The Suburbs To Pay For The Cities.” An in depth researcher of community organizer infiltrations, Kurtz points out how unelected regional boards are the tool of choice to bring huge social change all across America.

Kurtz also brings to light a new network for White House community organizers. (Not a new network for UN based NGO Smart Growth activists). Traditionally, socialist community organizers have worked closely with liberal church groups to achieve their goals of inner city social upheaval. Recently, however, the newly minted agency Building One America (formed by leaders of the scandalized Gamaliel Foundation) has added a new social change sector—public sector employees sympathetic to the progressive goals of socialist community organizers. The Chicago-Alinsky molded friends of the Obama White house are noisily linking into the network quietly developed by the UN Smart Growth radicals. There will be more big government courting of local public planners. Liberal churches are passe.

In other words, in addition to religious social terrorists like Jeremiah Wright, the USA now will have public planner social terrorists to deal with. (Something Whatcom County has been dealing with for two decades—think multiple Resources lawsuits (Carl Weimer) and Futurewise and its unofficial first review privileges at the County Planning Department.  A key element of this movement is the shifting of governance from local elected councils to regional, appointed boards. Does this sound like Puget Sound Partnership? Kurtz’s book deals primarily with urban/suburban community tax base mingling. A few months ago, in a three part series of articles linked to in today’s news digest, Kurtz pointed out another critical mass development.

Students at Harvard recently “pressured” the administration to divest Harvard of the stocks of fossil fuel industry corporations. The uber progressive Harvard administration cheerily complied. Seattle mayor, Mike McGinn has also jumped on Bill McKibben’s bandwagon, instructing the city of Seattle to avoid holding these stocks as of now. Gas and oil stocks are hot commodities, and such actions will really do little to harm these corporations at this point.

BUT—and this is important, a generation of college students are practicing “killing”, imagining the death of industrialized society—studying fossil fuel stock divestment on their i-pads, texting about it on their i-phones, and dreaming about it while flitting about in their parents’ Toyota Prius cars—industrial enabled conveniences. At some point, “the mother of all dialectic struggles” will begin, and the industrial complex will be carved up and redistributed by a matured generation of millenials.

I finish with a nod to another recently released book, “This Town”, by veteran DC reporter Mark Liebovich. “This Town” humorously and cynically profiles the “Beltway Club”, bloated by both Republican and Democrat lobbyists, making fabulously huge salaries in K Street offices on the backs of tax payers. Has K Street come to Whatcom County in the form of PSP funded facilitators? Is the end of local volunteer government at hand?

Am I cynical? Yes. Is there a path through all this? Yes. “Let him that stole steal no more, but rather, let him work with his hands, that he may have to give to him who has need.” Will you or I learn to work and share from public planners whose environmentalist consultant/facilitator friends feed off planning grants from Puget Sound Partnership? Probably not. Could we learn to work under the tutelage of outside fossil fuel interests running at an environmentally sound bulk shipping terminal at Cherry Point? That would be more probable.

Even better, learn the ropes and start your own business. Avoid the philosopher king urge to “kill the masters” that give us lights and communications and wheels and wings. Question the establishment environmentalists. And, learn to appeal regional board grant driven power grabs. In the event of failed appeal, graciously hold your nose and work the bridges. Remember the hidden hand. All hard work brings a benefit.

And, please vote. Vote for candidates who will deprioritize the group think zoned high density urban globalist university talking head enclaves. Vote for candidates who will support work ethic building clean heavy industry and the sweat of the brow value added agricultural farmer (not just farmerless Ag land). Vote for the choice to work local and live local—in the whole county, not just in Bellingham. --JK






Monday, October 7, 2013

Who is “Uniting Creatives”? What are “Vibrant Futures”? How big should a mouthful be?


Saturday, an organization called “Uniting Creatives” hosted a conference on “Vibrant Futures” at Syre Hall. Someone had sent us a link to a 4th Request for Proposal Submittal to the Bellingham Port Authority, a late entry from Uniting Creatives. I went to the Uniting Creatives website, and found the conference promo the day it happened, October 5, 2013. Too bad—I had scheduled a client that day.

Looking at the Uniting Creatives RFP document, the word “Utopia” comes to mind. It is everything that everyone wants. Global change. Global leadership. New luxury code. Waterfront trails. Olymic size pool. Green energy. Blue economy (oceanography). Green economy. Toxic clean up strategies. Urban gondola to WWU campus. Global grad school campuses. Incubation of new entreprenuers. Global media complex. Dozens of environmental agency stickers.  All really nice stuff. A breath of fresh air from the no coal drum beat.

Maybe the “jobs first” election campaigns are are beating the “no coal” campaign, and a different tack is needed. Maybe the “handlers” pulled Terry Wechsler out of the GPT debate at the Tea Party so as to promote a carrot instead of a stick. Maybe I should not be so cynical.

Sifting through the layers of the Uniting Creatives website, I found a link to a 5-23-13 Joe Show (KBAI Progressive Talk), where Phylis Joy Gilfilen and Lane Southcott of Uniting Creatives explained their goals and methods. Both are longtime local residents with business success stories and business clout. Joe Teehan interviewed the pair last week as well, 9-30-13. Great ideas. Great enthusiasm. Great energeee.

Uniting Creatives is scheduled to present their RPF submittal to the Port of Bellingham today, Monday, October 7, 2013. I would suggest you look at the draft on their website. See link below.  Note that in the mile long list of collaborative agencies, somehow Whatcom Business Alliance and the Building Industry Association of Whatcom County did not sign on. What issues might they have with “Vibrant Futures”.

So, what does this mean? “Vibrant Futures”  works to get people on opposite spectrums together. breaking down fears, reactive and adversarial patterns. We are to recognize scare stories that snooker and polarize us for lifetimes. We are to see our high intelligence, and go after the bad system. The problems are not with me, and not with you, but… with what we have made together in the past. Lets throw it all out and start over. Cash flow is king. Make whatever compromise is necessary to get the cash moving again. Great ideal. This is also an opportunity to give away the store to the globalist movement. Everything has a price tag!!

Being snookered. Having fears. Why did the thirteen colonies press separation of government powers so far? Was it not to make individual abuse of power more difficult?  Is man always good, just needing the right environment to resolve his problems himself? Progressives declare  the divine spark in man, but then legislate every aspect of life. Conservatives declare a fallen, sinful mankind, and then let the free market spank the miscreants. The Enlightenment in the French Revolution left a legacy of death and destruction. Puritans and Virginian gentlemen gave us separation of powers, which has served the United States very well.

I looked at parts of the three other RFP submittals for water front master plan redevelopers. Solid credentials with past development experience. Organizations that have developed waterfront communities and economies.  Uniting Creatives will need more than chutzpah for a long range master developer role.

The Uniting Creatives RFP submittal rests on a gentleman named Paul Holmes, a seasoned leader in Olympics development, with significant success milestones in his career. And, it is driven by the desire of many locals to “get back in the game”, to put small businesses (500 or fewer employees) in the driver’s seat. SSA’s cooperation with larger natural resource firms supposedly makes them not a small business.  The UC submittal for the local port is so global in its scope that it may ultimately be untenable.

Which brings me to the elections and the Port Candidates. If the ethos of the Vibrant Futures/Uniting Creatives master developer proposal is the “fuzzy goodness” of creativity (listen to the two Joe Shows), we definitely need single bottom line port commissioners who can separate chaff from wheat. I would not vote for either Mike McCauley or Renata Kowalcyk. We do not need commissioners who are “easy collaborative negotiators”, simply echoing the Vibrant Futures applicants.

 Whatcom County may be over regulated, but creative anarchy would be worse. There is a reason why capital investment loans require collateral. We need master plan developers who are in this for the long haul. Peace makers eventually run up against stake holders, and must have the grit to endure the hail of resistance and the droughts of desertion. Good feelings and vibrant futures are only secured with significant personal sacrifice. It will be up to the commissioners to choose the master developer. I will vote for highly stable candidates, not the ultra flexible ones.




Thursday, September 5, 2013

Lummi Tribe Declares War on Cherry Point Industrial Zone

In a letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lummi Nation Chairman Tim Ballew says the tribe "has unconditional and unequivocal opposition" to the Gateway Pacific Terminal coal export pier that SSA Marine hopes to build at Cherry Point.

Read more here.

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Council Candidates Shun Tax Funded Environmental Litigant Forum

There has been a lot of media focus on a cancelled candidate forum for this evening, which was to be hosted by Futurewise of Whatcom County.  Apparently the so-called conservative candidates had declined to participate in the forum.  The reasons given for that decision were based on the ongoing litigation between Futurewise and RE Sources for a Sustainable Community, and the potential conflict that would likely occur at a forum sponsored by these litigants:...

To read more, go here. 

Saturday, August 24, 2013

SSA Marine Lawsuit Settlement Refills Coffers of ReSources and Puget Sound Environmentalists

Pacific International Terminals, the SSA Marine subsidiary pursuing the Gateway Pacific coal export terminal at Cherry Point, has agreed to pay $1.65 million to settle a lawsuit stemming from the company's unauthorized land-clearing work on the property in 2011.

Read more here: http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2013/07/31/3122404/ssa-marine-pays-165-million-to.html

Herald: John Stark: Big Win for Environmental Opponents of Gateway Pacific Terminal

Whatcom County and its regulatory state and federal partners have announced they will conduct a sweeping review of Gateway Pacific Terminal’s environmental impacts — an apparent victory for the coal terminal's opponents.

Read More: at the Bellingham Herald

Read more here: http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2013/07/31/3121522/ecology-will-study-impact-of-coal.html#storylink=cpy
Read

Senator Doug Erickson Website Link: Environmentally Driven Ruling Thwarts International Resource Trade

Today the Washington State Department of Ecology and Whatcom County announced their decision on the EIS scope for the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal, located at Cherry Point, Washington. With this announcement, Washington state has set a new precedent that could potentially interfere with international commerce laws protecting rail and trade and discourage new business investment in the state.

 Read More:http://view.s4.exacttarget.com/?j=febe127271600d75&m=fe8d1570726c027571&ls=fe2b16797165037a741673&l=ff64167676&s=fe5b1376756c01797314&jb=ffcd16&ju=fe6c1570706500797417&r=0