The full context is found in my article entitled “WhatcomWorks has Legs”, September 7, 2013.
Money and grants is a
huge issue. Not just for farmers, but even more for the local integrating
organizations and elected/appointed officials who manage them.
Wise use of grants is
very good. But when grants and LIO institutions create dependency, innovation
is stifled, prudent management of land and water is constricted, and timely
farm to market adjustments are put off.
Do socialism and
market interventions really help? Can pencil oriented college type
“stewards” and “baykeepers” really be trusted to keep their hands off the grant
monies? When does a huge flow of grants cut off the legs of elected overseers
and put unelected adventurers in the public policy driver’s seat.
Now, pencils are mostly used for making marks on paper.
Pencils are used by college professors and students. Pencils are used by shop
managers in factories. Pencils are used by scientists in the field. Pencils are
used in dart games during midnight study orgies before the big test.
College types. Bill Clinton went to college. George
Washington Carver went to college. Most community leaders go to college. My
wife and I went to college. No, I did not inhale.
Not mentioned in the question, but hot on the heels of
the quote are the designations “stewards” and “baykeepers”. Perhaps this is
more to the point. I was intentional in using these words. ReSources has its
baykeepers. Current environmental science talks about all people being
stewards.
One more point before I diverge. Terry Wechsler asked me
that question. She is no stranger to college or pencils. (And, I have yet to
talk with her in person. I do like her candor!) But her withdrawal from a
street level debate shows the mindset of “college oriented pencil types”. I do
not fault her. I think she is sincere in wanting to engage in the community.
But, apparently there are “college oriented pencil types” who want certain
things to stay out of sight, where they can control the dialogue and outcomes.
And, I would suggest, there was money involved. Perhaps dilution of campaign
money and strategies. Or, perhaps, respecting the wishes of donors and grant agencies
and community organizers who engage with “baykeepers” and “stewards.”
I grew up on a college campus. My dad was in support
services. My grandfather was the first president of the college. As a child of
staff, I received subsidized tuition. After graduation, I worked in a charity
that was financed by donors. I lived in Italy for 14 months as part of that
charity’s cross cultural training program. I left a part of my heart in another
part of the world.
My wife graduated from college and returned to work for
five years as secretary to the academic dean of the college before we were
married. It was a small college, but we both understand the academic world. Before
we had children, we lived and worked in Toronto, Canada in the head office of
the same charity I trained with in Italy. I did payroll, accounts and handled
donor receipting. My wife did casual secretarial work. I understand “office
overhead percent”. That paid for office workers. Not for profit sector workers
get paid, either out of general fund donations, or by some “benefit
corporation” or other benefactor.
The big change came when children came. I did not want to
travel in charitable work, but wanted to be available for children. That meant
getting a “real job”. Not that my prior work was not real or valuable, but it
did not pay for itself. I had to consider money, profits, skills that people
would pay for.
I ended up apprenticing as an electrician. With two small
children to support, I was paid to learn to be an electrician. We made it.
Living frugally, getting help from parents, and working into the blue collar
world. After several years, I looked in the mirror and saw a different person.
I was no longer a “college oriented pencil type.” I had a kit of tools and was
imagining what it would be like to own an electrical company.
My friends also changed. Most of our college associates
stayed in the white collar tracks. In 1994, we bought a raw five acres of
pasture land south of Sumas. In 1999, we acquired dairy sheep and started
making our own sheep’s cheeses. We planted a small orchard. After submitting to
the will of electrical bosses for fourteen years, in 2006 I started my own
electrical contracting business.
We have raised our family, not in a pencil oriented,
college type environment. We home schooled them on an environmentally friendly
hobby farm. The older ones have been challenged to do entry level jobs before
going to college. We do not regret the thousands of tuition dollars we did not
spend on the first educational interests of our young adults. Their life
experiences outside the pencil oriented college world are sharpening their
world view and bringing together blue and white collar perspectives.
To the point. I rarely see blue collar type people trying
to ram through cultural change, top down. Maybe union bosses. College
professors are often intense cultural activists. Charitable activists can be
just as hard nosed toward their perceived opponents as businessmen can be
towards other businesses or even their own employees. Stakeholder mentalities
and turf minding happens in charities and government as well as in business. It
is human nature.
It is one thing to talk about a skill. It is another
thing to perform it. It is altogether another thing to spend the 20,000 hours
(4 to 5 years) that give journeyman level skill in accounting, medicine, trades,
you name it. College years don’t count in those working life hours. When I see intense
adversarial approaches to environmental stewardship, I think to myself,
probably another “pencil oriented college type” person trying to fast track their
20,000 hours, or assuming that their 20,000 hours qualify them to supersede the
20,000 hours of other trades or professional leaders.
Maybe that is inaccurate. Maybe there are larger cross
cultural issues in community conflicts. But then, is not the white collar—blue
collar divide a cross cultural issue? Is not GMO food production and non GMO
consumption a cross cultural cultural divide? Like getting Swahili speakers and
Chinese speakers to solve a problem in one hour?
Pencil oriented college types. One more story. Last fall,
2012, at an afternoon conference on the Future of Food, hosted by Huxley
College, Stephen Trinkhaus of Terra Organica was lecturing on the disastrous
effects of growing food on the environment, even organic food. During a pause,
he was asked if he had ever had a garden. After an uncomfortable pause, he
candidly admitted that plants had never done well under his care. Point made.
College oriented pencil types. Good intentions, but needing to be tempered by
walking a mile in the other person’s moccasins, by not assuming that my 20,000
hours give me license to affect huge changes in that other person’s life. That
is why County Council election candidates with the “my 20,000 hours rule”
attitude are an accident waiting to happen. Think about it.
Terry, Thanks for the question. JK
JK, Thanks for the beautifully-written blog. As a story teller myself, I always appreciate hearing other people's stories, and find the best dialogues begin with long introductions where all those in the discourse tell their stories as briefly as possible. It's where we learn about shared experiences and values (because, being ego-centric, that which resonates personally is always the most interesting, no?). My son, Sam -- to the extent he studied anything at all at Evergreen -- focused on sustainable farming in college and we can only dream he will put his (unpaid) experience learning artisan cheese making in Tuscany (his favorite is sheep's milk) to use and get a job. He's the reason I have to chuckle when I'm described as a job-hating environmentalist. The truth is I'm a retired Army colonel's wife who got my business and law degrees almost as a hobby since it was difficult to pursue a career while moving every 4 years and raising a family. I don't belong to any environmental organization and certainly don't receive funding from any (my husband could only wish), and I think jobs are great! I wish Sam had one.
ReplyDeleteFor me, what resonated the most about your story was the transition from altruism to practicality, with the birth of the children being a catalyst for changed goals, behavior, and attitudes. And your theme, if I read your post correctly, resonates with me as well: we do ourselves a huge disservice by not listening to each other.
I do want to have a dialogue. And let's do it on our terms. I'll buy the coffee if you'd like to discuss it further.